Skip to main content
Platform

Every stage of the study writes to the same record.

Design, fieldwork, literature review, coding, statistics, and reporting are not five tools passing files between them. In Heurista they are one connected study record, so the question every reviewer asks, how was this finding produced, always has an answer.

What the same Heurista workspace actually contains.

These are capability areas inside one product, not separate products for different users. Teams can start from an evaluation canvas, a research instrument, imported field data, a literature review, or existing evidence, then move into analysis and reporting without rebuilding the record.

Heurista evaluation canvas with framework selection, key evaluation questions, and source requirements
01/ 06

Study setup and evaluation canvas

Define the study, instruments, frameworks, key evaluation questions, indicators, sources, and evidence standards before analysis starts.

See evaluator use case
Heurista collection workspace with multiple instruments, languages, consent, and release checks
02/ 06

Collection and field-data intake

Prepare instruments for deployment, manage study languages and consent, push XLSForms to KoboToolbox or ODK Central, or hand off validated exports to SurveyCTO and other XLSForm-compatible tools alongside CSV and transcript intake.

Explore collection
Heurista coded transcript with highlighted qualitative evidence segments and applied codes
03/ 06

Qualitative coding, literature screening, and source review

Review transcripts, search connected literature catalogues, import restricted sources, screen records, apply codes, and keep respondent, connector, and source context visible while analysis develops.

See coding tools
Heurista statistics workspace with data preparation, population controls, methods, filters, and analysis controls
04/ 06

Statistics and mixed-methods analysis

Prepare and segment the dataset, analyze the whole survey or selected respondent groups, and use descriptive, inferential, regression, reliability, longitudinal, and panel procedures beside the same study record used for qualitative review.

See statistics
Heurista evidence synthesis workspace with candidate findings and source trail
05/ 06

Synthesis and evidence matrix

Turn coded excerpts, screened studies, tables, documents, and reviewer notes into candidate findings that remain traceable to their source material.

See evidence matrix
Heurista report options including analytical findings, code and indicator reports, evidence matrix, and executive summary
06/ 06

Report outputs and review packages

Create analytical findings reports, code or indicator reports, evidence matrices, PRISMA-ready review summaries, briefs, visualizations, saved report versions, and review packages.

See report outputs

Open the capability area behind the work.

Use this index when you want the detailed feature surface. The grouping is for navigation only: collection, analysis, reporting, governance, and review all live in the same study workspace.

Next step

Test the workflow on one real study.

Bring a real study. Design instruments, collect responses, code the evidence, run analysis, and draft a report. The useful test is whether the source trail still makes sense at the end.

Human review  ·  No training on your data  ·  Source-linked findings